Total submissions: 3
| Submitter | RCV | SCV | Clinical significance | Condition | Last evaluated | Review status | Method | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene |
RCV006451945 | SCV007335447 | uncertain significance | not provided | 2025-07-22 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis suggests that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge |
| Ambry Genetics | RCV005844460 | SCV006535276 | uncertain significance | Inborn genetic diseases | 2025-08-06 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | The c.274G>A (p.V92M) alteration is located in exon 1 (coding exon 1) of the GDF6 gene. This alteration results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 274, causing the valine (V) at amino acid position 92 to be replaced by a methionine (M). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. |
| Labcorp Genetics |
RCV005225968 | SCV005862308 | uncertain significance | Klippel-Feil syndrome 1, autosomal dominant; Isolated microphthalmia 4; Microphthalmia, isolated, with coloboma 6; Leber congenital amaurosis 17 | 2024-11-27 | criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | This sequence change replaces valine, which is neutral and non-polar, with methionine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 92 of the GDF6 protein (p.Val92Met). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with GDF6-related conditions. Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt GDF6 protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. |